Clearwater Analytics Holdings,
Stocks
HP Inc.
Stocks
Clearwater Analytics Holdings vs HP Inc.: A Detailed Price-to-Value Comparison in Tech Stocks
Last updated: June 7, 2026
Summary
This comparison evaluates Clearwater Analytics Holdings and HP Inc. from a value-for-money perspective, focusing on key financial metrics, growth potential, and dividend yields. While HP offers a more stable profit margin and dividend income, Clearwater provides a lower market cap and higher growth potential, making each suitable for different investor profiles.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Aspect | Clearwater Analytics Holdings, | HP Inc. | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | Approximately $7.27 billion USD | Approximately $23.39 billion USD | HP Inc. |
| Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratio | PE ratio is not available (negative EPS) | PE ratio of approximately 9.47 | HP Inc. |
| Profit Margin | -5.82% | 4.45% | HP Inc. |
| Dividend Yield | None | 4.69% | HP Inc. |
| Revenue Scale | $825.73 million USD | $57.42 billion USD | HP Inc. |
Market Capitalization: HP's market cap is over three times larger, indicating greater market confidence, liquidity, and stability, which often correlates with better value-for-money for risk-averse investors.
Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratio: HP’s PE ratio of 9.47 suggests it is valued more reasonably relative to its earnings, offering better immediate value compared to Clearwater, which has negative earnings.
Profit Margin: HP's positive profit margin indicates profitability, providing a more reliable value proposition; Clearwater’s negative margin signals current losses, reducing its value-for-money appeal.
Dividend Yield: HP’s dividend yield of 4.69% offers steady income, enhancing value for income-focused investors, whereas Clearwater does not pay dividends.
Revenue Scale: HP’s large revenue base signifies a more established and diversified business, offering better value stability compared to Clearwater’s smaller revenue of $825 million.
Detailed Analysis
When assessing Clearwater Analytics Holdings and HP Inc. from a value-for-money perspective, several critical metrics come into focus. Clearwater’s market capitalization of approximately $7.27 billion USD indicates a smaller, potentially more agile growth-oriented company. However, its negative EPS of -0.18 USD and profit margin of -5.82% highlight ongoing losses, which diminish its current valuation attractiveness. Its forward PE of around 28.25 suggests investors are expecting growth, but the negative earnings raise concerns about sustainability.
In contrast, HP Inc. boasts a significantly larger revenue of over $57.4 billion USD and a market cap nearing $23.39 billion USD, reflecting its status as a mature, stable enterprise. Its EPS of 2.7 USD coupled with a profit margin of approximately 4.45% demonstrates consistent profitability, translating into a PE ratio of nearly 9.47, which is considered attractive and indicates good value relative to earnings. The dividend yield of 4.69% makes HP appealing for income investors seeking steady returns.
From a risk perspective, Clearwater’s beta of 0.596 suggests lower volatility compared to the overall market, which might appeal to conservative investors but is offset by its negative earnings and lack of dividends. Conversely, HP’s beta of 1.184 indicates slightly higher market sensitivity but is supported by earnings and dividends, offering better value stability.
Overall, HP’s combination of profitability, dividend payouts, and revenue scale makes it a more attractive value-for-money stock for investors prioritizing stability, income, and established market presence. Meanwhile, Clearwater’s smaller size and growth prospects are better suited for investors willing to accept higher risk for potential future gains, though at present, its valuation metrics do not justify a higher value-for-money ranking.
Verdict
HP Inc. is the clear value-for-money winner due to its strong profitability, stable dividend yield, larger market capitalization, and reasonable PE ratio. Clearwater Analytics, while potentially appealing for growth-focused investors, currently offers less value because of its negative earnings and smaller scale. For investors seeking steady income and proven profitability, HP is the more prudent choice; those willing to accept risk for future growth might consider Clearwater, but only when its financial metrics improve.
Who Should Choose What
Choose Clearwater Analytics Holdings, if...
Investors looking for high-growth potential in the software application sector, and those comfortable with negative earnings seeking future upside.
Choose HP Inc. if...
Income-focused investors, those valuing dividend yields, and investors seeking stability from a large, profitable tech hardware company.
Learn More
Related Comparisons
Marriott International vs HP Inc.: A Data-Driven Comparison for Investors and Business Strategists
HP Inc. vs Tenable Holdings, Inc.: A Price-Focused Comparison for Investors
HP Inc. vs EOG Resources, Inc.: Which Stock Offers Better Value-for-Money in 2024?
Long-Term Investment Comparison: Clearwater Analytics Holdings vs BorgWarner Inc.
Colgate-Palmolive vs HP Inc. Long-Term Investment Comparison: Which Stock Offers Better Growth and Stability?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings vs Waste Management, Inc.: A Data-Driven Comparison for Investors